As more of the allegations against President Trump and potential crimes committed during his campaign is shown to be false, the allegations against Hillary Clinton have risen. And I’m not talking about the beaten to death, but true, email scandal.
The newest allegation against Hillary Clinton, revealed with the crumbling of the Mueller investigation’s use of the Russian Dossier, is that officials within the Obama administration actively worked to help get Clinton elected, luckily they failed.
At least one member of Congress is not to happy about the revelation either.
Time to investigate high-ranking Obama government officials who might have colluded to prevent the election of @realDonaldTrump! This could be WORSE than Watergate!
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) December 21, 2017
Worse than Watergate really? Well, Watergate involved a sitting President breaking into the party headquarters of another party. This scandal involved a sitting President and his administration actively working to ensure that the next President would be somebody that the current administration approved of. If you ask me that is way worse. Not only because the level of participation is the Obama-Clinton scandal is much higher, but they seemed to be trying to establish some sort of dictatorship.
Rand Paul is absolutely right. This allegation must be examined because if true the implications are devastating. If this goes unpunished a President will be able to choose their predecessor at will.
If I am not mistaken we fought a 7-year war back in 1776 to get rid of a dictatorial monarchy. I don’t know why we would want to allow an administration to create another one.